Ghrelin O-acyl transferase and the growth hormone secretagogue receptor mediate the adipogenic action of unacylated ghrelin in murine bone marrow revealing a novel endocrine mechanism

Physiology 2015 (Cardiff, UK) (2015) Proc Physiol Soc 34, C63

Oral Communications: Ghrelin O-acyl transferase and the growth hormone secretagogue receptor mediate the adipogenic action of unacylated ghrelin in murine bone marrow revealing a novel endocrine mechanism

L. C. Parsons1, R. C. Brown1, A. L. Hopkins1, C. L. Lewis1, A. Thompson2, J. Davies2, T. Wells1

1. School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom. 2. Institute of Life Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.

View other abstracts by:


Unacylated ghrelin (UAG) accounts for approximately 80% of circulating ghrelin, but does not bind to or activate the receptor for acylated ghrelin (AG), GHS-R1a (1). However, UAG exerts a distinct spectrum of activity, promoting adipogenesis in bone marrow (2), but not abdominal fat (WAT; 3) and inhibiting skeletal growth (4). In the absence of an alternative receptor, we investigated the potential role of GHS-R in mediating these skeletal effects of UAG. As previously shown in rats (2), intra-bone marrow (ibm) infusion of AG and UAG (from an osmotic minipump connected to a tibial ibm catheter implanted under isoflurane anaesthesia) induced adipogenesis in male wild-type (WT) mice, increasing the number of tibial marrow adipocytes from 22±3 cells/field (vehicle-infused; n=5) to 42±1 cells/field (AG; n=5; P<0.001) and 37±3 cells/field (UAG; n=4; P <0.05; all data mean±SEM, compared by 1-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test). Surprisingly, this effect was abolished in male loxTB-GHS-R (GHS-R-null) littermates, AG- and UAG-treated mice having 100 (n=5) and 88% (n=5) of the adipocytes in vehicle-treated GHS-R-null animals (n=5). Neither AG nor UAG had any effect on tibial epiphyseal plate width (EPW). Immunocytochemistry revealed that, unlike stomach (which expressed the activating enzyme, ghrelin O-acyl transferase (GOAT), but not the adipocyte-specific marker, PPARγ) and intra-abdominal WAT (which expressed PPARγ, but not GOAT), rat tibial marrow adipocytes co-expressed both PPARγ and GOAT. Furthermore, the adipogenic effect of a tibial ibm UAG infusion (as above) was abolished in male GOAT-null mice (41±2 cells/field in vehicle-treated (n=6) vs 48±3 cells/field in UAG-treated (n=6)), compared to a 120% increase in UAG-treated male WT littermates (16±3 in vehicle-treated vs 35±6 in UAG-treated; n=5,6; P <0.05). Again, UAG had no effect on tibial EPW. However, both GHS-R-null and GOAT-null mice displayed elevated marrow adiposity compared to their WT littermates (P <0.01), suggesting that elevated circulating UAG may produce maximal adipogenesis in these mice. ELISA of terminal plasma samples revealed that circulating ghrelin (total) was not elevated in either GHS-R-null or GOAT-null mice. Thus, our data demonstrate that the adipogenic effect of UAG in bone marrow is dependent upon acylation by GOAT and activation of GHS-R. The ability of cells expressing these proteins to activate UAG prior to signalling through GHS-R represents a novel endocrine mechanism. Indeed, the cell-specific distribution of these proteins in conjunction with the differential uptake mechanisms for AG and UAG may thereby determine the unique activity spectra of these two hormones.



Where applicable, experiments conform with Society ethical requirements.

Site search

Filter

Content Type