A membrane-targetted palmitoylated peptide replicating a phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate binding site inhibits IK(M) and modulates muscarinic receptor-mediated inhibition

University of Glasgow (2004) J Physiol 557P, C43

Communications: A membrane-targetted palmitoylated peptide replicating a phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate binding site inhibits IK(M) and modulates muscarinic receptor-mediated inhibition

J. Robbins and D.A. Brown

Pharmacology, UCL, London, UK

View other abstracts by:


It has been suggested that IK(M) (KCNQ/KV7) channels are regulated by phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2:Suh & Hille, 2002; Zhang et al., 2003). We have used a novel approach employing N-terminal palmitoylated decapeptides (palpeptide) to study this transduction pathway (Robbins & Brown, 2003).Rat superior cervical ganglion cells (isolated from rats killed by approved Schedule 1 methods) in primary culture were superfused at 230C with (mM) NaCl 144, KCl 2.5, MgCl2 0.5, CaCl2 2, Hepes 5, glucose 10, pH 7.4. The amphotericin perforated variant of the patch clamp technique was used with electrodes filled with (mM) K acetate 80, KCl 30, Hepes 40, MgCl2 EGTA 3, CaCl2 1, pH 7.2. Cells were clamped at -20mV and stepped to -50mV for 1 second to generate IK(M) deactivating tail currents. All peptides were synthesised by ABC, Imperial College, London, purified to >90% with RPHPLC and dissolved in DMSO at 10mM. The original peptide (H-palmitoyl-HRQKHFEKRR-CONH2) is based on the putative PIP2 binding site on KCNQ2-5 (Zhang et al, 2003) and a range of variants produced: K4M, H5C, K8M, K4MK8M, non palmitoylated and a fluorescein labelled version.The PIP2 palpeptide inhibited IK(M) with an IC50 of 1.5 ± 0.2µM (n=7); the non- palmitoylated version was ineffective up to 10µM (n=6). The muscarinic receptor antagonists, atropine (1µM) and pirenzepine (0.3µM), did not reduce the effectiveness of the PIP2 palpeptide. PIP2 palpeptide had no effect on other potassium currents such as IK(A) and IK(DR). The fluorescein labelled version confirmed a plasma membrane localisation of the PIP2 palpeptide. To investigate the residues likely to be involved in PIP2 binding we used a number of mutants and assessed their potency in inhibiting IK(M). The K4M and H5C mutants showed no significant change in potency, IC50s 0.7 ± 0.1µM (n=5) and 0.9 ± 0.3µM (n=5) respectively. Conversely the K8M and the double mutant K4MK8M were significantly (p<0.05 ANOVA) less potent on the current (IC50s 3.2 ± 0.9µM (n=5) and 3.4 ± 0.5µM (n=5) respectively). All slope values were not significantly different from each other or unity. Further, low concentrations of PIP2 palpeptide increased the sensitivity (IC50) of IK(M) to oxotremorine-M evoked inhibition from 0.8 ± 0.1µM (n=6) to 0.5 ± 0.1µM (n=6) 0.2 ± 0.04µM (n=6) at 0.1 and 0.3µM PIPpalpeptide 2 respectively.We suggest that the PIP2 palpeptide is effectively buffering PIP2 levels in the membrane so reducing IK(M) amplitude and increasing its sensitivity to muscarinic receptor mediated inhibition. Furthermore the lysine residue near the C-terminal end of the palpeptide seems to be important for PIP2 binding.



Where applicable, experiments conform with Society ethical requirements.

Site search

Filter

Content Type