Background: The X-allele of the α-actinin 3 (ACTN3) R577X gene polymorphism has been positively associated with elite endurance athlete status [1, 2] although others have found no association [3, 4]. The aim of the study was to: (i) compare the ACTN3 R577X genotype and allele frequency distributions in ‘elite’ and ‘sub- elite’ marathon runners with those of a non-athlete population; (ii) determine whether marathon personal best time (PB) was associated with ACTN3 R577X genotype. Methods: One hundred and twenty-four elite (men n=31; women n=31) and sub-elite (men n=43; women n=19) athletes, who participated in the 2013 London Marathon, and 566 non-athlete controls provided whole blood, buccal or saliva samples, from which DNA was isolated and the ACTN3 R577X polymorphism genotyped. PBs were verified via www.powerof10.org and used to determine elite (men <2.5 h; women <3 h) or sub-elite (men 2.5-3 h; women 3-3.5 h) status. Chi-square analysis was used to compare genotype and allele frequency distributions between athletes and controls, while any genotype-dependent differences in marathon PB were investigated using a one-way ANOVA for men and for women.Results: There were no significant differences in genotype or allele frequency distributions between the elite (RR 35.5%, RX 53.2%, XX 12.9%; R 61.3%, X 38.7%) and sub-elite (RR 29.0%, RX 53.2%, XX 17.7%; R 55.7%, X 44.3%) or controls (RR 35.2%, RX 47.5%, XX 17.3%; R 59.0%, X 41.0%); P ≥ 0.393. PBs were not genotype-dependent for either men or women (P ≥ 0.314).Conclusions: The findings strongly suggest that the ACTN3 R577X polymorphism does not play a role in influencing elite/sub-elite marathon runner status, or in determining marathon PB performance.
Physiology 2014 (London, UK) (2014) Proc Physiol Soc 31, PCA158
Poster Communications: ACTN3 R577X genotype is not associated with elite marathon runners
S. J. Lockey1, R. M. Erskine3,2, A. J. Herbert1, C. R. Pedlar4, C. G. Kipps2, A. G. Williams1,2, S. H. Day1
1. MMU Sports Genomics Laboratory, Institue for Performance Research, Manchester Metropolitan University, Crewe, United Kingdom. 2. Institute of Sport, Exercise & Health, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom. 4. Centre for Health, Applied Sport and Exercise Science, St Marys University, Twickenham, London, United Kingdom.
View other abstracts by:
Where applicable, experiments conform with Society ethical requirements.