Age-dependent cellular changes in response to SARS-CoV-2 in nasal epithelial cells

Physiology 2023 (Harrogate, UK) (2023) Proc Physiol Soc 54, PCA038

Poster Communications: Age-dependent cellular changes in response to SARS-CoV-2 in nasal epithelial cells

Maximillain Woodall1, Ana-Maria Cubja1, Kaylee Warlock1, Sara Teichmann1, Kerstin Meyer1, Marko Nikolic1, Claire Smith1,

1Great Ormond St Institute of Child Health, UCL London United Kingdom, 2Wellcome Sanger Institute Cambridge United Kingdom, 3UCL Respiratory London United Kingdom,

View other abstracts by:


BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 is the virus responsible for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Although this virus affects people of all ages, studies have shown that the elderly are at a higher risk of severe disease and death from COVID-19 compared to children, who once infected with SARS-CoV-2 rarely progress to respiratory failure. We aimed to investigate this by studding how the cells lining the nose respond to SARS-CoV-2 infection in people of different ages.

 

METHODS: To do this, we cultured differentiated primary nasal epithelial cells (NECs) at air-liquid interface from three different age groups: paediatric (<14 years, n=11), adult (30-50 years, n=9), and elderly (>70 years, n=9) individuals. Ethical approval was given through the Living Airway Biobank (REC reference: 19/NW/0171). We then used a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach using functional assays and scRNAseq to analyse the cellular landscape of the infected cultures and examined the replication of the virus within the different cell subtypes.

Study Population

Total cultures 

analysed (n)

Total cells for scRNAseq

Total n

29

 

251

 

% Female

41%

 

38%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brushings

n

Age (mean ±SD)

n

 

Paediatric (0-11y)

14

4.9 ±4.2​

118

32,892

Adult (30-50y)

9

36.9 ±2.7​

65

​56,221

Elderly  (70y+)

9

83.6 ±6.7​

68

​50,485

 

 

 

Total cells

139,598

RESULTS: Our data revealed that nasal epithelial cell subtypes show different tropism to SARS-CoV-2, correlating with age and ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression. For example, we found that ciliated cells are a viral replication centre across all age groups, but a distinct goblet inflammatory subtype emerges in infected paediatric cultures, identifiable by high expression of interferon-stimulated genes, truncated viral genomes, greater sub-genomic viral RNA, and less infectious progeny compared to older adult cultures. On the other hand, SARS-CoV-2 infected elderly secretory cells were shed, and cultures suffered greater epithelial damage with age. Dysfunctional repair pathways were stimulated, and there was an increase in basaloid-like cells that are associated with fibrosis markers and greater viral spread. We hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 infected nasal epithelial cells undergo reprogramming by these mechanisms in an age-dependent manner and that these processes contribute to COVID-19 pathogenesis by delaying disease resolution and enhancing viral spread.

 

CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides new insights into age-associated COVID-19 pathogenesis. We found that SARS-CoV-2 exhibits differential tropism for nasal epithelial cells with age, with preferential infection of paediatric goblet or elderly secretory cell types. Infected paediatric goblet cells mount a robust innate antiviral response to SARS-CoV-2 dominated by interferon, which correlates with reduction in infectious viral load. In the elderly dysfunctional repair pathways are stimulated, and there is an increase in basaloid-like cells that are associated with fibrosis markers and greater viral spread. These insights could aid in the development of new treatments for COVID-19, particularly for older individuals who are at greater risk of severe infection.

 

This work is currently published as a preprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.01.16.524211v2.full



Where applicable, experiments conform with Society ethical requirements.

Site search

Filter

Content Type