Using the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique and video-imaging analysis, we have recently reported activation of the volume-regulated anion channel (VRAC) in response to hypotonic stress (Harvey et al. 2002, 2003). In the present study, we have further characterised the VRAC and investigated its molecular identity.
Whole-cell patch-clamp studies were performed as previously reported (Harvey et al. 2003). Data reported below were obtained by 100 ms step depolarisations from -80 to +100 mV from a holding potential of -60 mV, and are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. current densities (pA pF-1). Significant differences were determined using Student’s paired t test or ANOVA followed by the Tukey HSD test.
Cells were bathed in isotonic bath solution containing (mM): NaCl 110, CaCl2 1, MgCl2 1, Hepes 10, adjusted with NaOH (pH 7.3) and mannitol (300 mosmol (kg H2O)-1). They were dialysed with a pipette solution containing (mM): NaCl 50, EGTA 1, MgCl2 1, Hepes 10, adjusted with NaOH (pH 7.3) and mannitol (290 mosmol (kg H2O)-1). Under these conditions CAD cells displayed a maximum outward current of 8.4 ± 2.4 pA pF-1 and maximum inward current of -0.30 ± 0.44 pA pF-1 (n = 16). After a 5 min exposure to an iso-ionic hypotonic solution (230 mosmol (kg H2O)-1), the outward current increased to 48.2 ± 6.5 pA pF-1 and the inward current increased to -15.0 ± 3.0 pA pF-1 (n = 16, P < 0.001). The reversal potential (Erev), -14.7 ± 1.4 mV (n = 16), was similar to the theoretical Erev for a Cl–-selective conductance under these conditions. Some of the data above have previously been reported (Harvey et al. 2003). Bath perfusion with the Cl– channel antagonist tamoxifen (10 µM) reduced the outward current (56.4 ± 15.6 pA pF-1) to 22.1 ± 4.8 pA pF-1 (n = 4, P < 0.05), but had no significant effects on the inward current. This inhibition was reversed following washout with hypotonic solution (53.8 ± 26.3 pA pF-1, n = 4). The molecular identity of the VRAC is controversial, with two members of the voltage-dependent Cl– family, ClC-2 and ClC-3, proposed as the most likely candidates. The expression of members of the ClC family was examined in CAD cells and liver tissue, isolated from humanely killed rats, using RT-PCR. Using primers specific for ClC-1, -2, -3, -4 and -5 (ClC-2, ClC-3; Enz et al. 1999), transcripts for ClC-2, -3, -4 and -5 were identified in liver; but only ClC-3, -4 and -5 were identified in CAD cells.
In conclusion, CAD cells possess swelling-activated currents that display properties consistent with those of the VRAC reported in other cell types. Furthermore, the biophysical properties of the VRAC, and RT-PCR analysis suggest that ClC-2 does not represent the molecular candidate for the VRAC in CAD cells.