Contrasting effects of flecainide on atrial arrhythmia in wild-type and RyR2-P2328S mice

Physiology 2014 (London, UK) (2014) Proc Physiol Soc 31, C03

Oral Communications: Contrasting effects of flecainide on atrial arrhythmia in wild-type and RyR2-P2328S mice

S. C. Salvage1, J. H. King1, K. H. Chandrasekharan1, H. R. Matthews1, L. Guzadhur2, C. L. Huang1,2, J. A. Fraser1

1. Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 2. Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

View other abstracts by:


Atrial fibrillation (AF), is the commonest cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality (1). Yet its underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. Cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) gain-of-function mutations predispose to catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) (2) and in some cases, including RyR2-P2328S (RyR2s/s), atrial arrhythmia (3). Recently, an anti-arrhythmic effect of flecainide (flec) was reported in CPVT (4). However, the effect of flec on RyR2-related atrial arrhythmias has not been studied.We explored the effects of flec (1 µM) on arrhythmic incidence, action potential conduction velocity (CV), refractory period (RP), wavelength (λ = CV x RP) and Na+ current activation and inactivation, in wild-type (WT) and RyR2s/s hearts. WT and RyR2s/s mice (3-11 months) were killed in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (1986). Hearts were Langendorff-perfused and paced at 8 Hz (S1) with interposed S2 stimuli at progressively shorter S1-S2 intervals (3). Left atrial epicardial excitation was recorded by a 32 pin multi-electrode array (MEA). CV was determined using velocity vector analysis, while RP was quantified as the last non-refractory S1-S2 interval. Loose patch-clamp experiments determined Na+ current properties in superfused atrial preparations as previously described (5). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Statistical significance (to p<0.05) was tested using two-way ANOVA or paired t-tests as appropriate.Arrhythmic score in RyR2s/s (2.65±0.38, n=17) was higher than that of WT (1.10±0.22, n=10) (Fig. 1). Flec increased arrhythmic score in WT (2.65±0.38, n=9) but decreased it in RyR2s/s (1.59±0.39, n=17). Flec slowed CV in WT from 0.38±0.024 m s-1, n=14 to 0.22±0.02 m s-1, n=10, p<0.001, and did not influence RP (control: 24.6±1.5 ms; flec: 27.7±3 ms, n=9). In contrast, flec did not alter CV in RyR2s/s (control: 0.28±0.02 m s-1, n=14; flec: 0.29±0.02 m s-1, n=10), but increased RP from 23±1.8 ms to 34±3.9 ms, n=17, p<0.001. Thus, flec decreased λ in WT (8.69±0.72 to 6.72±0.86 mm, n=8, p<0.05) but increased it in RyR2s/s (6.27±0.78 to 7.38±0.83 mm, n=10, p<0.05). Activation and inactivation studies revealed smaller Na+ currents in RyR2s/s than WT. Flec increased Na+ currents in RyR2s/s yet reduced them in WT. This suggests that the expected inhibition of Na+ channels by flec was opposed by concurrent inhibition of RyR2-mediated release of SR Ca2+, previously shown to reduce Na+ channel function (3,5).These findings demonstrate that flec decreases atrial arrhythmia with increased λ and Na+current in RyR2s/s, yet increases atrial arrhythmia with decreased λ and Na+ current in WT.



Where applicable, experiments conform with Society ethical requirements.

Site search

Filter

Content Type