Potentiated vasoconstrictor responses in mesenteric arterioles in elevated extracellular glucose may be due in part to a reduction in receptor desensitisation

37th Congress of IUPS (Birmingham, UK) (2013) Proc 37th IUPS, PCB413

Poster Communications: Potentiated vasoconstrictor responses in mesenteric arterioles in elevated extracellular glucose may be due in part to a reduction in receptor desensitisation

R. Jackson2, N. W. Davies2, R. D. Rainbow1

1. Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom. 2. Cell Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom, United Kingdom.

View other abstracts by:


Elevated extracellular glucose potentiates vasoconstrictor signalling in vascular smooth muscle. We have previously demonstrated that elevating bathing glucose from 5 to 20mM causes a marked increase in contractile responses, recorded using wire myography, to angiotensin II (ATII), UTP, U46619 in mesenteric(1), and U46619 in coronary arterioles that is PKC-dependent in mechanism(1,2). We hypothesised that 20mM glucose reduced receptor desensitisation in a PKC-dependent manner so providing a mechanism to explain the increased vasoconstriction in elevated bathing glucose.Rat mesenteric arterioles (200-400μm in diameter) were mounted in a Mulvany-Halpern myograph (Danish Myo Technology, Aarhus, Denmark) and maintained at a constant temperature of 37°C. Arteries were held under a tension equivalent to 90% of the diameter of the vessel at a pressure of 100 mmHg in 1.8 mM Ca2+ recording solution containing 5 or 20mM glucose for 30 minutes prior to experimentation. The myograph chamber was continuously perfused throughout the recording. 60mM potassium was applied to cause a depolarisation-induced contraction and all data was normalised to the peak contraction. 100nM ATII was perfused for 45 seconds followed by 100 (approximate EC50 value), 300 (maximal) and then a second 100μM addition of UTP to measure desensitisation for 5 minutes each, with a 5 minute wash between applications. Finally, 100nM ATII was reapplied at the end of the recording. In 5mM glucose, the second submaximal UTP response was reduced to 54.2±5.3% (n=10) of the first response and was unaffected by inclusion of 20μM L-NAME to inhibit eNOS (61.6±3.9%, n=20). In 20mM glucose this desensitisation was reduced to 76.4±4.2% (82.4±6.5% with L-NAME, P<0.01 compared to 5mM glucose control for both with and without L-NAME, t-test). Similarly, ATII desensitisation was reduced by 20mM glucose (5.1±2.4% vs 34.6±8.6%, 5 and 20mM glucose respectively, 20 vessels in each concentration, P<0.01, t-test). Inhibition of PKCα and β with 300nM Gö6976 in 20mM glucose attenuated the reduction of desensitisation to the same level as in 5 mM glucose control (54.2±5.3%, 76.4±4.2%** to 48.4±3.3%, in 5mM, 20mM glucose and with Gö6976 respectively, **P<0.01, ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test), and reversed the ATII reduction in desensitisation ( 5.1±2.4%, 34.6±8.6% to 4.0±2.7% in 5mM, 20mM glucose and with Gö6976 respectively, **P<0.01, ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test). In this study we demonstrate that receptor desensitisation is markedly reduced by increasing bathing glucose from 5 to 20mM, but that this can be attenuated using conventional PKC inhibition. This data support our hypothesis that glucose-mediated PKC activation reduces receptor desensitisation and enhancing vasoconstrictor responses in elevated glucose.



Where applicable, experiments conform with Society ethical requirements.

Site search

Filter

Content Type