The effect of omega-3 supplementation on exercise-induced muscle damage

Europhysiology 2018 (London, UK) (2018) Proc Physiol Soc 41, PCA184

Poster Communications: The effect of omega-3 supplementation on exercise-induced muscle damage

Y. Kyriakidou1, C. Wood1, B. T. Elliott1, A. Dolci2

1. University of Westminster, London, Please Select, United Kingdom. 2. Hydration Health Department, Danone Nutricia Reseach, Paris, France.

View other abstracts by:


Exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) results in transient muscle inflammation, strength loss, muscle soreness (Damas et al., 2016) and can result in subsequent exercise avoidance. Omega-3 (n-3) supplementation has been proposed to minimise EIMD via its anti-inflammatory properties (Jakeman et al., 2017), however its action remains unclear. We aimed to examine the effects of n-3 supplementation on exercise-induced inflammatory response following muscle-damaging exercise. Physically active, healthy Caucasian males (n = 14, 25.07 ± 4.05 years) provided written informed consent, then were single blind randomised to either receive 3 g/day n-3 supplementation (N-3, n = 7) or placebo (PLA, n = 7). Following 4 weeks n-3 supplementation, a downhill running protocol (60 minutes at 65% VO2max, -10% gradient) was performed. Before supplementation (baseline), prior to EIMD, immediately after EIMD, and at 24, 48, and 72 hours post-EIMD, venous plasma was collected for creatine kinase (CK), interleukin (IL)-6 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-a, and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), anaerobic power and perceived muscle soreness were also quantified. Results are presented here as ‘mean ± SD’. No significant differences in CK activity were found between N-3 and PLA group (p = 0.363), however, PLA showed a larger increase in CK levels (baseline- vs 24h post-EIMD) compared to N-3 (882.8% ±564.8 vs 496.1% ±275.4, respectively). PLA group showed a larger increase in IL-6 compared to N-3 immediately post-EIMD (162.3% ±68.6 vs 123.3% ±15.1, respectively), however, there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.422). TNF-a showed a smaller increase for the N-3 group compared to the PLA, again, there were no significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.320). No significant difference in MVIC between N-3 and PLA group (p = 0.883) was found, however, there was a significant main effect for time (p = 0.008) with both groups showing a reduction in muscle strength immediately post-EIMD. No differences in peak power were found between N-3 and PLA group across time (p = 0.798). No significant difference in muscle soreness was found between N-3 and PLA (p = 0.3), however, the latter showed a larger increase in muscle soreness (pre- vs post-EIMD) compared to the N-3 group (>165.1% vs N-3). In this study, even though we recorded some reduction in the plasma markers for the N-3 group, there was no statistically significant decrease to allow us to draw any definitive conclusions about the n-3 supplementation. Additionally, there was no impact on muscle function nor power output. Future studies might compare the dosage and duration of n-3 supplementation on muscle function or examine the effect of n-3 supplementation on EIMD during ageing-associated muscle function loss, where increased basal inflammation is seen.



Where applicable, experiments conform with Society ethical requirements.

Site search

Filter

Content Type