The effect of recovery work-rate on the parameters of the power-duration relationship following exercise to exhaustion in humans

University of Cambridge (2008) Proc Physiol Soc 11, C91

Oral Communications: The effect of recovery work-rate on the parameters of the power-duration relationship following exercise to exhaustion in humans

S. R. Murgatroyd1, C. Ferguson1, S. A. Ward1, B. J. Whipp1, H. B. Rossiter1

1. Institute of Membrane & Systems Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

View other abstracts by:


In order to sustain exercise immediately following exhaustive cycle ergometry, the external power output (P) needs to be reduced below the subject’s critical power (CP) (Coats et al., 2003): CP being the asymptote of the hyperbolic power-duration relationship (P-tlim), which is also defined by a curvature constant, W′, equivalent to a fixed amount of work that can be performed above CP (Poole et al., 1988). This is consistent with a W′ ‘depletion’ mediated intolerance – supra-CP exercise is then only feasible with, at least partial, W′ replenishment. That some subjects cannot sustain even sub-CP exercise following exhaustion (Coats et al., 2003) suggests that the preceding exercise may reduce CP and constrain W′ repletion. We therefore aimed to estimate the P-tlim relationship, together with pulmonary O2 uptake (VO2), across a range of recovery work-rates following exhaustion. We hypothesised that CP would be reduced following recovery at high (95% CP) but not low work-rates. Six healthy men (23 ± 5 yrs; mean ± SD) gave informed consent to perform: 1) incremental-ramp cycle ergometry for estimation of the lactate threshold (LT); 2) 4 different high-intensity constant-P tests (CON), each on separate days and taken to the tolerable limit, to estimate VO2max and establish the P-tlim parameters (CP and W′); 3) a 10 min constant-P test at CP. CP and W′ were also estimated after each of three 6 min recovery bouts (REC) from exhaustive exercise (~6 min): 20 W, 105% LT and 95% CP. Gas-exchange was measured breath-by-breath by mass-spectrometry and turbinometry (MSX, Morgan Medical, UK). At the tolerable limit of all exercise bouts, VO2 attained maximum (4.13 ± 0.43 l.min-1). Whereas CP (CON: 242 ± 27 W) was unchanged in REC (240 ± 28, 239 ± 25, 243 ± 31 W at 20 W, 105% LT, and 95% CP, respectively), W′ (CON: 20.1 ± 4.9 kJ) was progressively reduced the higher the recovery P (REC: 10.9 ± 2.6, 8.2 ± 1.5, and 2.8 ± 2.1 kJ). VO2 recovery during REC was also dependent on recovery P (reaching 1.13 ± 0.13, 2.45 ± 0.35, and 3.68 ± 0.39 l.min-1, respectively), but was not well correlated with W′: the repletion of which was appreciably attenuated during high P recovery. Therefore, these data suggest that neither prior exhaustive exercise nor recovery P affect CP. However, because VO2 during REC 95% CP remained above (p < 0.05; t-test) the 10 min CP value (3.48 ± 0.38 l.min-1) this suggests that the metabolic equivalent of CP may be increased during high P recovery, and limit W′ restoration. Exercise tolerance following exhaustion therefore, presumably depends on the degree to which the external power requirement and its metabolic equivalent are reduced at the tolerable limit.



Where applicable, experiments conform with Society ethical requirements.

Site search

Filter

Content Type